|
Providing a Safe Environmentfor GBLQ Youth at Camp
by Rob Alexander with Christa Kriesel
Controversy. Dialogue. Differing opinions. Some would say that this is
the foundation of enlightened inquiry. This inquiry may be rational, emotion-filled,
or obstinate. The choice is yours.
Perhaps few issues have the potential to draw a larger “line in
the sand” over which there can be the expression of strong personal,
philosophical, and religious views than the issue of sexual orientation.
It has been likened to views about race relations in the 40s and 50s.
For some, it is an issue of deeply held religious convictions. For others,
it is an issue of constitutional freedoms in America.
Whatever your view, there is no doubt there have been campers and staff
at your camp who have a sexual orientation that is different from yours
and which may be different from the philosophy or teaching of the ownership/sponsor
of your camp.
The authors share what it means for a camp to take the position that
providing safe environments for all children, youth, and adults —
regardless of sexual orientation — is foundational to its reason
for being.
Agree or disagree. But do so based on a thoughtful exploration of how
we can work together to find support and positive development for youth
as they transition to adulthood.
The American Camping Association has taken no public policy position
on the issue of sexual orientation. We believe that such issues must be
handled by individual camps consistent with the philosophy and mission
of their owners/sponsors/directors. We encourage camps to establish policies
and procedures consistent with their mission and purpose while seeking
to provide positive development for the youth and adults in their influence.
What follows is one camp’s approach, and an opportunity for you
to consider your own camp’s response to this segment of our diverse
and dynamic society.
Preparing for my first year as a summer camp director in North Carolina,
I felt on top of the world and ready for anything. I had risen through
the staff ranks at my camp and thought I had seen or experienced everything
that could possibly happen at our summer program. That is, until “Anna”
arrived for her leadership training experience.
She stood at the registration table — a returning camper of several
years with the same gregarious smile and carefree attitude. What was different
was the rainbow flag patched to her daypack and the T-shirt exclaiming,
“Don’t Assume I’m Straight.” Here was a young
teen asserting her sexuality and a new camp director with no idea what
to do.
“How will this affect the other campers? Will my staff be comfortable
working with Anna?” “Anna is open with her sexuality. How
many campers do I have who are not?” And most importantly, “How
can I be sure that Anna has the same positive camp experience that we
provide every other youth in our care?”
The visibility of sexual orientation diversity appears more frequently
in the lives of young people today than any time before. Television sit-coms,
Internet Web sites, popular movies, and the news media all discuss and
debate sexuality issues frankly and openly. At the same time, young people
are “coming out” as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or questioning
(GLBQ) earlier and earlier. Given that many youth identify summer camp
as a place to explore their self-identities, it is not a surprise that
more and more camps have begun to share similar experiences to mine. If
a goal of camp professionals is to provide positive growth experiences
for all campers, it becomes important to prepare our programs and ourselves
for young people like Anna.
This article provides current infor-mation regarding sexual orientation
and youth and describes specific ideas for reacting to camper sexual identity
in a manner appropriate to the camper’s well- being and consistent
with our camp missions. The article refers to nonheterosexual youth as
“GLBQ” — which stands for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and
questioning (See list of terms for definitions). Gender identity is not
addressed although terms for gender have been included in the resource
section.
What Does It Mean to Be GLBQ?
Two of the first questions staff asked regarding Anna were, “What
do we think we know about sexuality?” and “What do we actually
know?” The answers provided some interesting misunderstandings and
obvious needs for up-to-date information.
 |
|
 |
| Terms |
Straight/Heterosexual
— a person who is emotionally and physically attracted
to people of the opposite gender. |
| Gay/Lesbian/Homosexual
— a person who is emotionally and physically attracted
to people of the same gender. |
Bisexual — a person
who is emotionally and physically attracted to people of any
gender.
(Please note that identifying
himself/herself as any of the above sexual orientations does
not imply that a person is sexually active.) |
Queer — a term many
youth use to describe their sexual orientation. The general
belief is that “gay,” “lesbian,” and
“bisexual” are too limiting and that “queer”
gives a greater depth of expression. This can be confusing
to some, as “queer” is often considered a derogatory
term in other contexts. |
Questioning — a
legitimate identity of still formulating sexual orientation
or gender identity. |
Gender Identity —
a psychological term referring to one’s core sense of
maleness or femaleness. |
Gender Dysphoria —
a clinical term used to describe unhappiness or discomfort
experienced by someone whose biological designation does not
match his or her internal gender identity. |
Transgender — a
person who challenges “traditional” gender roles
by various means including wearing clothing not generally
associated with his or her own sex or even modifying his or
her bodies. Individuals identifying as transgender may identify
with any sexual orientation, including heterosexual. |
| Homophobia — a
fear of homo-sexuality usually caused by ignorance and often
leading to discrimination and marginalization of GLBQ people. |
|
 |
 |
 |
Many misconceptions that have persisted over the years about GLBQ youth
have been shown to be incorrect by the medical, psychological, and educational
communities. A 1999 document developed and endorsed by such groups as
the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Psychological Association,
and the American Counseling Association enforces the fact that homosexuality
is not a choice. Rather, “sexual orientation is one component of
a person’s identity, which is made up of many other components,
such as culture, ethnicity, gender, and personality traits (www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/justthefacts.html,
accessed 9/7/03).”
Although researchers have not proven the cause of a person’s sexuality,
the National Mental Health Association affirms that “many researchers
believe sexual orientation to be complex with biology playing an important
role. Many people are born with their sexual orientation, or it is established
at an early age.” Similarly, “you can’t raise a child
to be gay nor can parents or therapists change a young person’s
sexual orientation, just as they can’t change their eye color, race,
or height (2002, www.nmha.org/whatdoesgaymean/questions.cfm,
accessed 11/14/02).”
A common and very incorrect misconception about sexuality is that there
is a link between GLBQ individuals and child molestation. The American
Psychological Association posts on its Web site that “there is no
evidence to suggest that homosexuals are more likely than heterosexuals
to molest children (www.apa.org/pubinfo/answers.html,
accessed 9/7/03).” Sexual orientation does not define the behavior
of an individual. One should therefore not assume that a GLBQ staff member
or camper may be a danger to others because of their sexual orientation.
Many individuals wonder why GLBQ people feel a need to disclose their
sexuality to others. “Coming out,” as this is called, refers
to the lifelong process of acknowledging one’s gay, lesbian, or
bisexual attractions and identifying to oneself and disclosing this fact
to others. Coming out is a normal tendency to want to share personal information
with important others and takes a certain amount of courage and trust
(Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation & Youth, 1999). Unlike their
heterosexual peers, GLBQ youth must learn to manage their identity without
sufficient support and modeling from parents, family, and traditional
mentors. Coming out enables them to find that support and is an important
step in a youth’s development towards becoming a healthy adult in
our society (Ryan and Futterman 1998). Often, youth spend several years
aware that they are different from their peers and undergo a sometimes
painful internal process of coming to understand that difference. Some
youth are “outed” by others before they are ready —
when someone with knowledge of their sexuality makes that information
public. This can lead to emotionally damaging situations for the outed
youth.
The average age of coming out has been dropping in recent years. In
1982, males were coming out at age fifteen while females at age twenty.
By 1993, these ages dropped to thirteen and fifteen (www.glsenco.org
2003). This may or may not be a sign of society becoming more tolerant
of sexual diversity amongst young people. Regardless, this statistic does
suggest that youth organizations will experience more situations involving
youth who identify as GLBQ.
Camps should all have a policy that is discussed in staff training relating
to what is and is not suitable to discuss with campers and each other.
Because of the variety of parental values around these issues, discussions
by either heterosexual or GLBQ staff about their view or experiences are
not appropriate.
Challenges Facing GLBQ Youth
Over the course of our camp session, Anna revealed some of the challenges
she faced on a daily basis at school and in her home community. Much was
learned from talking with her directly, but further research after that
summer uncovered some disturbing information.
Two studies in the states of Washington and Massachusetts (1995, 1997)
found GLBQ youth to be five times more likely to experience violence and
harassment, twice as likely to partake in heavy drug use, and seven times
more likely to attempt suicide than their heterosexual peers. In school,
between 30 and 70 percent of GLBQ youth experienced verbal or physical
assault and almost 28 percent eventually dropped out. Half of the youth
surveyed believed that all homosexuals were unhappy (www.advocatesforyouth.org
2003). The recent documentary, Out in the Cold, declares that half of
all homeless youth in our country are GLBQ, many of whom leave home or
are turned out because of their sexuality.
After Anna, we wondered how many GLBQ youth actually came through our
programs and whether or not we were inadvertently reinforcing such statistics.
We wanted to provide a safe place . . . but how could we do this without
completely transforming our regular camp program?
Building Safe Spaces
Before we could begin finding the answers to this question, we had to
agree that our programs must support all youth, including those who may
be GLBQ. This challenged us to understand our own limitations regarding
sexuality issues. We realized that the extent to which we were comfortable
talking about or dealing with these issues directly related to our ability
to support GLBQ youth . . . and staff, for that matter. If we were not
comfortable and did not have the necessary knowledge but were determined
to be supportive, it was important that we accessed resources outside
of our organization.
Doing just that, we established nine ideas from interviews with youth
pro-fessionals, existing literature, and accounts of actual summer camp
experiences. Together, they provide a range of specific actions applicable
to any camp program.
-
We examined our organization’s non-discrimination policy for
staff and campers. Did it include “sexual orientation”?
Having these words included provided a rationale for creating safe
environments for GLBQ youth and staff in our program areas.
-
Campers may not identify as being GLBQ themselves, but may have GLBQ
parents. We considered the text of our registration forms concerning
spaces for parent names. Instead of assuming “Mother”
and “Father,” we inserted more neutral words such as “Parent”
or “Guardian.”
- We looked at our staff hiring and management practices to determine
if they were inclusive of GLBQ staff and campers. If we are not creating
a safe environment for GLBQ staff, then our staff will not create a
safe space for GLBQ youth. Carolyn Thompson, program manager at Mountain
Meadow Camp in southern New Jersey, suggests that camp directors include
questions in staff interviews about comfort levels and experience working
with GLBQ people. This helps inform the potential staff member of an
intent to maintain open communication about GLBQ issues.
Just having the words “we do not tolerate discrimination against
GLBQ individuals” included in the staff manual is another step.
Reading these words out loud in a staff training session breaks the
ice that it is OK to talk about GLBQ issues and to ask questions.
Incorporating GLBQ information in a diversity awareness workshop begins
a dialogue that will help staff collect accurate information and understand
their own limitations regarding GLBQ issues. It also lets GLBQ staff
know that they are a resource for other staff.
-
We gave our staff the skills to create safe spaces. We knew that
well-prepared staff received accurate information about GLBQ youth
and had the opportunity to ask their own questions and explore their
own comfort level with GLBQ issues. Staff training included role playing
situations like campers “coming out” to staff, campers
using the words “that’s so gay” to describe something
they think is stupid, and campers talking about having GLBQ parents,
to name a few. Many organizations provide such information and training
for those who don’t have the resources available within their
own organization.
-
We learned that the most effective, but most often overlooked, method
for creating safe spaces is being aware of assumptions being made
and of the messages conveyed through what is — or is not —
talked about in a program. For example, using the general word “partner”
when discussing boyfriend or girlfriend relationships allows youth
to define for themselves who their partner can be. Also, asking campers
to clarify what they mean when they say “that’s so gay”
in a situation and explaining that “gay” is a word to
describe a group of people. How might the camper feel if someone said
that something strange was “so tall?”
Thompson reinforces this notion of language and communication. “A
lot of creating a safe place has to do with conversation. GLBQ people
know that they are not going to get away from homophobia. From a director’s
standpoint, if you know that you have GLBQ camp members, check in
and ask how their experience goes. Not talking about it is the most
hurtful experience.”
Kim Summers of YWCA Camp Westwind in Oregon agrees. “Camp
is such a critical place . . . a place where campers need to talk
about hard-to-discuss topics. There is a difference between facilitating
discussion on these topics and changing the subject.” The difference
can have long-lasting impacts on your campers.
-
We established a clear policy for staff on how to respond to campers
disclosing personal information regarding sexuality. As mentioned
before, “coming out,” even as questioning, is an important
developmental step. Our staff policy therefore encouraged positive
listening support and made available referral to supplemental information.
If a camper is already “out” like Anna, we informed staff
that their role is to affirm the camper’s identity and to enforce
a safe space for them in their peer group. However, be clear with
your staff that listening to a camper question their sexual identity
does not authorize the staff member to disclose sexual experiences.
We reminded our staff that sexual identity is not the same as sexual
behavior and that identity support does not require discussion of
personal sexual behavior.
In the case of a camper having questions beyond the boundaries of
this staff policy, we identified one administrative staff with training
and experience regarding GLBQ issues to provide more in-depth support
and information for the youth. Remember, when staff members tell youth
that it is not appropriate to talk about GLBQ issues at camp, it sends
a message that camp may not be safe for GLBQ youth.
-
We examined what sort of behavior expectations we had for our campers.
Does the camp’s anti-bullying policy specifically mention targeting
youth who are or who appear to be GLBQ? Letting campers and parents
know ahead of time that camp does not tolerate such bullying can prevent
future conflicts. Many staff members have heard both campers and staff
words used in a derogatory manner such as “homo, fag, faggot,
dyke, queer, sissy, and pansy.” Specifically addressing the
use of these words takes this prevention one step further.
In training, Summers facilitates a staff brainstorm of all the different
ways kids can be picked on for things over which they have no control
— like weight, skin color, gender, and sexuality. The staff
then create their own anti-bullying policy on how they want to be
treated and how they want to treat others. It is a technique that
provides stronger ownership in the policy.
-
We used diversity images like “Safe Zone” signs and
stickers at our facility. These images enforce respect for all diversity,
not just sexual orientation. Inclusive signs and symbols consistently
remind the camp community of camp policies.
-
For those of us in leadership positions, we must never forget that
our behavior serves as a model for how staff and campers alike will
act. When asked what makes her program more inclusive of GLBQ youth,
Kim Summers replied, “The biggest difference is simply that
we encourage our staff members to talk and listen to campers on these
tough issues versus referring them on to others.” By leading
this example, the difference becomes widespread.
What Summer Camp Is All About
The camp session with Anna ended up being very positive for campers
and staff alike — thanks to two outstanding leadership program staff
and a supportive camp community. However, as a camp director, I was lucky.
We could have faced many negative situations that might have adversely
impacted not only Anna, but other campers and staff in our program. What
has stayed with me the most from that summer with Anna is her strong belief
that our summer camp was a safe place where she could be herself without
fear of harassment or discrimination.
Since that summer, I have researched GLBQ resources in my own community
and worked to educate myself about the needs these youth present. The
process may be slow, but with this information, programs can become increasingly
safer for all youth who check in at the registration table. After all,
isn’t that what summer camp should be all about?
| References |
| Sarchet, Nick. Transgender
101. Equality Colorado. 1999. |
| www.youthresource.com/library/trans.html (accessed
3/13/00). |
| www.nmha.org/whatdoesgaymean/questions.cfm (accessed
11/14/02). |
| Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network.
Ten Things Educators Can Do. 2002. |
| www.glsenco.org/Educators/Counselors/coming%20out.htm.
Accessed 2/20/2003. |
| Just the Facts about Sexual Orientation &
Youth: A Primer for Principals, Educators and School Personnel. American
Academy of Pediatrics et al. 1999. |
| Ryan, Caitlin and Donna Futterman. Lesbian and
Gay Youth: Care and Counseling. New York: Columbia University Press,
1998. |
| www.advocatesforyouth.org/publications/factsheet/fsglbt.htm.
Accessed 2/20/2003. |
| Interview with Carolyn Thompson 4/4/2003. www.mountainmeadow.org. |
| Interview with Kim Summers 4/15/2003. www.campwestwind.org. |
| Out in the Cold, documentary (viewed 4/6/2003). |
Originally published in the 2003 November/December
issue of Camping Magazine. |